Tom Lane wrote:
Alan Li <a...@truviso.com> writes:
How much concern is there for the contention for use cases where the WAL
can't be bypassed?
If you mean "is something going to be done about it in 8.4", the
answer is "no". This is a pre-existing issue that there is no simple
fix for.
I thought he was asking if we intend to provide for WAL bypass on a
table by table basis in future.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
