* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes: > > Unfortunately, WAL bypass also requires not being in archive mode with > > no way to turn that off w/o a server restart, aiui. > > Well, if you're trying to archive then you certainly wouldn't want WAL > off, so I'm failing to see where this thread is going ...
I disagree. I'd love to be able to say "please bypass WAL logging for
this bulk load" because I know that I'll pick up the data during my next
full dump and I can reload it from original if I get disrupted before
then. This is especially true when you're doing bulk loads of static or
reference data from another data source.
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
