Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
I thought he was asking for a solution to the problem of WALInsertLock
contention. In any case, we have "WAL bypass on a table by table basis"
now, don't we?
If we do I'm ignorant of it ;-) How do we say "Never WAL this table"?
Make it a temporary table.
That doesn't help if you need the data visible in multiple sessions. But
we're digressing from the original topic. Sorry.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
