Hi, On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Magnus Hagander<mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > The second question is, is it worth doing this so extremely late in the > 8.4 development? After mentioning it quickly in an offlist discussion > with Heikki, I think our conclusion was that we should wait with this > until the tree opens for 8.5.
That's OK. I'll wait for 8.5. > It's not a very likely scenario that > anybody actually has pg_standby on a machine that doesn't have libpq on > it - since it needs to have a PostgreSQL server on it to make any sense.... My first concern was whether the latest pg_standby can work with old postgres (old libpq.so). Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
