Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> writes:
> 2009/7/12 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
>> If we're going to go for reentrancy
>> I think we should fix both components.
> when we don't use reentrant grammar, then we cannot use main sql parser in
> SQL?
It wouldn't be a problem for the immediate application I have in mind,
which is to re-use the core lexer in plpgsql. But it does seem like
it might be a problem down the road as plpgsql gets smarter.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
