> I'm also not sure how to handle this if the set has to be spooled to
> disk. Quicksort and Quickselect do a lot of scans throught he data and
> wouldn't perform well on disk.

I thing, so problem is in aggregate func used as window func - or some
missing optimalisation.

when I replaced count(*) over () by subselect (SELECT count(*) FROM
...) then I got expected speed.

Pavel

>
> --
> greg
> http://mit.edu/~gsstark/resume.pdf
>

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to