On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 19:12 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > (thinks...) Actually, u for unique might be a poor choice if Jeff's > patch goes in and starts using it for things that aren't exactly > unique indexes. Should it be just conindid?
My thoughts exactly.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
