Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rash...@googlemail.com> writes:
> 2009/7/29 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
>> For non-unique indexes, it is not required that <function>aminsert</>
>> do anything; it might for instance refuse to index NULLs.
> Doesn't this comment apply equally to unique indexes?
Hmm, I was thinking that a unique-capable index would have to index all
tuples. But I guess if it's restricted to one index column (like hash)
it could omit nulls and still enforce uniqueness correctly. I'll change
that comment.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
