Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > Thanks. The changes all look good - except I'm curious why %g vs. %f?
So as not to add ".000000" unnecessarily. Positive values for ndistinct
should be treated as integers. (I considered adding an error check to
reject values like 20.5, but refrained...)
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
