On 8/17/09 11:51 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > I went over this quickly, and attach an updated version. This is > updated to current CVS HEAD, and wordsmithed a little bit, and I removed > some things that didn't seem worth documenting. In particular, the > introduction claims that back-patched bug fixes won't be documented > here, which I agree with (at least for minor fixes); but that policy > wasn't being applied consistently.
I thought the Windows memory thing was a back-patch? -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. www.pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
