Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 13:59 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Robert Haas wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Bruce Momjian<br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > > > Josh Berkus wrote: > > > >> Per the above, it would not. ?It would make things worse. ?This has > > > >> been > > > >> true at every other OSS project I've seen documented (disastrously so > > > >> with MySQL); there is no reason to believe that Postgres would be any > > > >> different. > > > >> > > > >> I also do not see why you are so resistant to the idea of documenting a > > > >> tracking the post-CF steps so that we can get more people on them. > > > > > > > > Huh, who has asked for a list from me? ?This entire post is mostly > > > > over-the-top and not worth responding to. > > > > > > OK, I so request. :-) > > > > What do you want to know? Would someone post exactly what question I > > have not answered in the past? > > This is a fair point. I bet 10 bucks that a lot of the questions that > would be asked would be answered with, "check the archives". > > Didn't we do a release wiki page at one point?
Yes, we have a wiki for open items for the current major release. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers