Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
> At the same time, I think it's probably not a good thing that users who
> deal with very large amounts of data would be forced off the COPY fast
> path by a need for something like input support for non-rectangular
> data.
[ shrug... ] Everybody in the world is going to want their own little
problem to be handled in the fast path. And soon it won't be so fast
anymore. I think it is perfectly reasonable to insist that the fast
path is only for "clean" data import.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
