2009/9/15 Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com>: > I believe the terminology we've been using, at least for the past year > since I've been involved, is as follows: > > Open = open to new patches > In Progress = working on reviewing and committing patches, no longer > open to new patches > Closed = all patches have been dealt with > > So, no, 2009-09 was open yesterday. Now it's in progress, and 2009-11 is > open.
Yeah, that's what we've been using to date, but I do agree with Stefan that it's a bit confusing. I think part of the problem is that "open" and "closed" are normally opposites, but in our case they are talking about different things. Perhaps we should move to something like: Accepting contributions => Under review => Complete. Cheers, BJ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
