On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > On mån, 2009-09-14 at 21:14 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> [P.S. I learned my lesson - last CF the equivalent email said that the >> CF was "closed", which of course was not what I meant at all.] > > Yeah, except is it just me or is this "open" terminology equally weird? > Isn't the 2009-09 fest the one that is open right now?
I can't win. I believe the terminology we've been using, at least for the past year since I've been involved, is as follows: Open = open to new patches In Progress = working on reviewing and committing patches, no longer open to new patches Closed = all patches have been dealt with So, no, 2009-09 was open yesterday. Now it's in progress, and 2009-11 is open. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
