On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 12:37 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> "However, a named variadic argument can only be called the way shown in >> the example above. The VARIADIC keyword must not be specified and a >> variadic notation of all arguments is not supported. To use variadic >> argument lists you must use positional notation instead." >> >> What is the intended behavior? I think we should always require VARIADIC >> to be specified regardless of using named notation. >> > > maybe we could to support variadic named parameters in future - then > using VARIADIC keyword should be necessary - like > > foo(10 AS p1, 20 AS p1, 30 AS p3) is equalent of > foo(VARIADIC ARRAY[10,20] AS p1, 30 AS p3)
Pavel, This doesn't make sense to me, FWIW. I don't think we should allow parameters to be specified more than once. It's hard for me to imagine how that could be useful. >> I'm still reviewing the code. Jeff, When will you be able to post this review? Thanks, ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
