On 28 sep 2009, at 11.54, "Albe Laurenz" <laurenz.a...@wien.gv.at> wrote:
Dear hackers, I have been thinking about ways to have PostgreSQL reject weak passwords. I think the standard recommendation is "use PAM and LDAP", but that requires the user to change the password outside of PostgreSQL. And who would want to setup and maintain an LDAP server just for this? Since everybody has different ideas what is a good password, there should be some way to configure that. I've looked at how Oracle does it, and they simply let you write a stored procedure that throws an exception if it doesn't like the password. Since users are on cluster level and functions live in databases, that won't work in PostgreSQL. I have come up with an idea or two and like to hear your opinion. 1) One could have a set of GUCs like min_password_length, min_password_nonchars and similar that everybody could configure. This is not extremely flexible though. 2) Another idea would be a GUC that contains a regular expression that a password may *not* match. Perhaps that's too limiting too. 3) I have also considered a GUC that points to a loadable module that performs the password check if set. Are there better ways?
Isn't there some library we can link with and (conditionally) use? I believe windows exposes api function(s) to let you verify password complexity - I'm sure there is something similar available on unix, hopefully included on most common platforms?
/Magnus -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers