Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> writes:
> Tom Lane escribió:
>> This is the same issue already raised with respect to syslog versus
>> syslogger, ie, some people would rather lose log data than have the
>> backends block waiting for it to be written.
> That could be made configurable; i.e. let the user choose whether to
> lose messages or to make everybody wait.
Hmm, I guess I missed where you proposed an implementation that would
support that?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
