Magnus Hagander escribió: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 18:34, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > >> ... (and many of the more > >> significant remaining patches look like they are right up Tom's alley > >> anyway). > > > > FWIW, if left to my own devices I will eventually get to everything > > except the dblink, ecpg, and encoding/win32 patches. I don't intend > > to touch any of those because there are other committers better > > qualified to review them. (I don't actually think we have anybody > > except Michael who's really familiar with ecpg.) > > I can certainly review the win32 encoding patch, but I was rather > hoping for some comments from others on if we're interested in a win32 > only solution, or if we want something more generic. Should we just go > with the win32-only one for now?
Just a couple of days ago a question came on the spanish list because someone was getting mixed UTF8 and Latin1 output in a log file. This was in Fedora IIRC, so maybe we do want something more general. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
