On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 04:11, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takah...@oss.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > > Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > >> I can certainly review the win32 encoding patch, but I was rather >> hoping for some comments from others on if we're interested in a win32 >> only solution, or if we want something more generic. Should we just go >> with the win32-only one for now? > > Yes, because Windows is only platform that supports UTF-16 encoding natively. > I believe my patch is the best solution for Windows even if we have another > approach for other platforms.
Actually, I think a better argument is that since Windows will *never* accept UTF8 logging, and that's what most databases will be in, much of this patch will be required anyway. So I should probably review and get this part in while we think about other solutions *as well* for other platforms. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
