On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 10:14 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 13:06 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > >> I don't see where the problem is here. > > > In your last post you said it was necessary to use ONLY to address the > > required partitions and so setup would be weird. I am showing that this > > is not required and the setup is smooth. > > Peter is right and you are wrong: this setup STILL needs ONLY, unless > permissions are in sync with inheritance, ie, every child has the union > of its parents' permissions. It would work at least as well under > Peter's proposal as with the existing behavior.
What I proposed works, so perhaps we are talking about different things. If you wish to see all data you grant access to parent_full, if you wish to see recent data you grant access to parent_partial. The partitions can then be given access to the various users. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
