* Kevin Grittner (kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov) wrote: > >Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > > Do we have a patch which implements the necessary mechanics to > > replace RULEs, even for the specific situations you list? Until > > then, I don't think there's much to discuss. > > I thought that until we had discussion and consensus it was premature > to start working on a patch....
In general that's true, but in this case we're talking about removing a
pretty major feature and replacing it with something else. We havn't
got the 'something else' hammered out yet (or so it sounds to me..) and
I have doubts that we'd be able to really make a call on removing RULEs
until we know and have the specifics of what's replacing it.
That might be possible to do without a patch, but it requires a great
deal more documentation, planning, and information in general before a
decision could be made. Specifically, what people will actually do to
implement the things that RULEs used to provide.
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
