On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote:
> * KaiGai Kohei (kai...@ak.jp.nec.com) wrote:
>> Stephen Frost wrote:
>> > Thanks.  To make sure it gets picked up, you might respond to Tom's
>> > message above with this same email.  Just a thought.
>>
>> The following message was my reply.
>>   http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-08/msg01420.php
>
> Right, but now there's actually a patch to go with it..  Just thinking
> that Tom might pick up on it more easily if the patch was sent to that
> thread, that's all.  Of course, he seems to know all anyway, so it's
> entirely likely that I'm just being silly.
>
>> Now I'm removing something with behavior change such as above patch,
>> and eliminating comments to be discussed in other thread.
>> I would like to quote them not to forget them away.
>
> That's fine.  You'll start new threads with different subject lines for
> them, right?  That way other people will see the specific issues and
> comment if they want to.  I expect few people are actually following
> this very long thread at this level. :)

So what's the status of this patch currently?

...Robert

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to