David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 04:51:03PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Rod Taylor <rod.tay...@gmail.com> writes: >> > I tried making a functional index based on an expression >> > containing the 2 argument regexp_matches() function. Is there a >> > reason why this function is not marked immutable instead of >> > normal? >> >> regex_flavor affects its result. > > Speaking of which, can we see about deprecating and removing this > GUC? +1 It would seem to me to be more valuable to have the benefits of IMMUTABLE than preserve pre-7.4 compatibility forever. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
