On 10/14/09 2:07 PM, David Fetter wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 04:51:03PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Rod Taylor <rod.tay...@gmail.com> writes: >>> I tried making a functional index based on an expression >>> containing the 2 argument regexp_matches() function. Is there a >>> reason why this function is not marked immutable instead of >>> normal? >> regex_flavor affects its result. > > Speaking of which, can we see about deprecating and removing this GUC? > I've yet to hear of anyone using a flavor other than the default.
Actually, *we* (PGX) have a client who does. You just haven't worked on their stuff. --Josh -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
