Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: >> Maybe if I weren't burned out after a month of CommitFesting, I could >> muster a more positive reaction, but right now I just can't summon any >> enthusiasm for this. > > Based on this review, I am marking this patch Rejected.
Basically, I need to agree in spite of Stephen's efforts. > For what it's worth, I took a quick look at this just to see if I had > any reason to disagree with your conclusions. I don't. Sorry, please make clear the "your conclusions"? Does it mean that Tom's comment that this reworking does not go into the right direction? Or, my comment on the last message? Thanks, -- OSS Platform Development Division, NEC KaiGai Kohei <[email protected]> -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
