On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Kevin Grittner <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> wrote: > Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> Any change here is *not* a bug fix, it is a change of clearly >> documented and not-obviously-unreasonable behavior. We have to take >> seriously the likelihood that it will break existing code. > > Perhaps plpgsql could support tests of SQLSTATE, and recognize '02000' > (the standard value for "zero rows affected") to support the desired > new semantics?
+1 I rarely use found because it's dangerous ...would be nice to have a more rigorous test... merlin -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
