On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Greg Smith <g...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Right, those are the possibilities, all four of them have valid use cases in > the field and are worth implementing. I don't like the label > "semi-synchronous replication" myself, but it's a valuable feature to > implement, and that is unfortunately the term other parts of the industry > use for that approach.
BTW, MySQL and DRBD use the term "semi-synchronous": http://forge.mysql.com/wiki/ReplicationFeatures/SemiSyncReplication http://www.drbd.org/users-guide/s-replication-protocols.html Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
