Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Tom Lane escribió:
>> Yeah. Although the project policy is that we don't require Perl to
>> build on Unix, there was a bug in the makefiles that made it effectively
>> required, and nobody noticed for several years. I don't think it would
>> be a hard sell to change that policy if we got a significant benefit out
>> of it. (Depending on non-core Perl modules is a totally different thing
>> though.)
> Well, this is a pretty fortunate turn of events. I had two paragraphs
> in my original email that I edited out ("... so I'm not going to say
> more") on how to workaround the lack of Perl. If we're all OK now on
> requiring some basic Perl installation then all the better. I certainly
> have no trouble with it.
Although actually, we could still keep that policy if Perl is needed to
build .bki files --- we just have to build those files in distprep and
ship them as part of tarballs. It's already the case that you need Perl
to build from a CVS pull, it's only tarball users who don't need it.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
