Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On ons, 2009-10-21 at 13:11 +0900, Itagaki Takahiro wrote:
Client encoding is declared in body of a file, but BOM is
in head of the file. So, we should always ignore BOM sequence
at the file head no matter what client encoding is used.

The attached patch replace BOM with while spaces, but it does not
change client encoding automatically. I think we can always ignore
client encoding at the replacement because SQL command cannot start
with BOM sequence. If we don't ignore the sequence, execution of
the script must fail with syntax error.

I don't know what the best solution is here.  The BOM encoded as UTF-8
is valid data in other encodings.  Of course, there is your point that
such data cannot be at the start of an SQL command.

There is also the notion of how files are handled on Unix.  Normally,
you'd assume that all of

psql -f file.sql
psql < file.sql
cat file.sql | psql
cat file1.sql file2.sql | psql

behave consistently.  That would require that the BOM is ignored in the
middle of the data stream (which is legal and required per Unicode
standard) and that this only happens if the character set is actually
Unicode.



Cases 2 and 3 should be indistinguishable from psql's POV, although case 3 wins a "Useless Use of cat" award.

If we are only eating a BOM at the start of a file, which was the consensus IIRC, and we treat STDIN as a file for this purpose, then we would eat the leading BOM on file.sql and file1.sql in all the cases above but not on file2.sql since we would not have any idea where the file boundary was. That last case strikes me as a not very likely usage (I'm pretty sure I've never used it, at least). A file containing:

   \i file1.sql
   \i file2.sql

would be the workaround if needed.

As for handling the fact that client encoding can't be set in a script until after the leading BOM, there is always

   PGOPTIONS="-c client_encoding=UTF8"

or similar.

cheers

andrew




--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to