On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Greg Smith <g...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Pavel Stehule wrote: >> >> I don't wont to apply these patches tomorrow, I don't sending these >> patches for last moment. If I have to wait one weak or two weeks, ok. >> Declare it. I'll respect it. But actually I respecting all rules, what >> I know. > > If you're sending stuff intended for the next CommitFest in the middle of an > active one (which we'd prefer not to see at all but you have your own > schedule limitations), it would be helpful if you were to label those > patches as such. It's difficult for the rest of us to tell which of the > ones you're generating are in response to patches that are active during > this one, and which are intended for future review but you're just dropping > them off now. Had your new stuff been labeled "This is for the next > CommitFest, I'm just sending it to the list now", it would have made it > easier on everyone else to figure out which of your messages we need to pay > attention to and what should be ignored for now.
This expresses my feelings on the topic exactly, and perhaps merits inclusion in a Wiki page someplace. Maybe we need to have a wiki page on commitfest rules & expectations. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
