On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 17:15 +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: > > Simon Riggs wrote: > > > Recovery does *not* take the same locks as the original statements on > > > the master took. For example, the WAL record for an INSERT just makes > > > its changes without acquiring locks. This is OK as long as we only allow > > > read-only users to acquire AccessShareLocks. If we allowed higher locks > > > we might need to do deadlock detection, which would add more complexity. > > > > But we *do* allow higher locks than AccessShareLocks, as Tatsuo-sans > > example shows. Is that a bug? > > Sorry for confusion. My example is under normal PostgreSQL, not under > HS enabled.
Are you saying you want it to work in HS mode? Why would you want to PREPARE an INSERT, but never execute it? -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
