2009/11/25 Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com>: > On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 07:36 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: >> > Moving records from a function to a table can be done with: >> > INSERT INTO mytable SELECT * FROM myfunc(); >> > And that already works fine. >> >> It works, but COPY FROM myfunc() should be significantly faster. You >> can skip tuple store. > > If SRFs use a tuplestore in that situation, it sounds like that should > be fixed. Why do we need to provide alternate syntax involving COPY?
It isn't problem of SRF function design. It allow both mode - row and tuplestor. This is problem of INSERT statement, resp. INSERT INTO SELECT implementation. Regards Pavel > > Regards, > Jeff Davis > > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
