On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: > On Wed, November 25, 2009 3:56 pm, Jeff Davis wrote: >> >> I worry that we're getting further away from the original problem. Let's >> allow functions to get the bytes of data from a COPY, like the original >> proposal. I am not sure COPY is the best mechanism to move records >> around when INSERT ... SELECT already does that. >> > > > I am not at all sure I think that's a good idea, though. We have > pg_read_file() for getting raw bytes from files. Building that into COPY > does not strike me as a good fit.
I think we speak of the opposite direction... fdr -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
