Dave Page <[email protected]> writes: > OK - something like this? Should keep non-printable/control characters > out of logs too...
Personally I'd use guc_strdup and then modify the string in-place,
but that's just a matter of taste I guess. Otherwise it seems
reasonable.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
