On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 22:13 -0800, Jeff Davis wrote: > My disagreement with the row-by-row approach is more semantics than > performance. COPY translates records to bytes and vice-versa, and your > original patch maintains those semantics.
The bytes <-> records conversion is a costly one. Anything we can do to avoid that in either direction will be worth it. I would regard performance as being part/most of the reason to support this. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
