Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > It was written and submitted by one person who did not bother to ask > first whether anyone else thought it was worthwhile. So its presence > on the CF list should not be taken as evidence that there's consensus > for it.
Should we have "Needs Discussion" phase before "Needs Review" ? Reviews, including me, think patches with needs-review status are worthwhile. In contrast, contributers often register their patches to CF without discussions just because of no response; they cannot find whether no response is silent approval or not. Regards, --- ITAGAKI Takahiro NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
