Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On tis, 2009-12-01 at 18:03 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Tom Lane wrote: > > > Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: > > > > 2009/12/1 Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us>: > > > >> What are we going to do for build farm members who don't support > > > >> threading? Is someone going to manually update their configure flags? > > > > > > > Yeah, I think so. > > > > > > > Unless there's a whole lot of them, in which case we revert the patch. > > > > > > It would seem like we ought to try the one-liner patch Magnus proposed > > > (ie flip the default) and see what the effects are, before we go with > > > the much larger patch Bruce wrote. > > > > OK, done --- let the breakage begin. (I will be monitoring the build > > farm and will work with Andrew Dunstan on any issues.) > > You have removed all the configure code that defined > ENABLE_THREAD_SAFETY, but there is still lots and lots of code that > checks for #ifdef ENABLE_THREAD_SAFETY. So this is is probably quite > broken at the moment.
Yep, you have identified the bug, and I have applied the proper patch, thanks. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
