On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> If we're really doing it, sure. But putting half of it in >> TopMemoryContext and the other half in CacheMemoryContext is not >> obviously of any value. > > There isn't any of that stuff that's *in* TopMemoryContext. Whether the > hash table contexts are children of TopMemoryContext or > CacheMemoryContext would be important if we were ever going to reset > either, but we aren't. The main point in my mind is that it be possible > to tell from a memory stats dump how much is being used for what, and we > do have that.
Oh, I see. I was thinking that it might matter that the hash table contexts are descended from TopMemoryContext rather than CacheMemoryContext, but I guess that doesn't matter very much. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
