Tom Lane wrote: > As pointed out here > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2010-01/msg00145.php > the current zic code doesn't cope gracefully with lack of working > int64. Considering the trouble we've gone to throughout the rest > of the system to support such compilers, it's a bit annoying to > have this little detail break it. On the other hand, it's unclear > that anybody still cares. (Other than people running SCO Openserver, > for whom I have little sympathy anyway.) > > Thoughts? Is it worth expending any energy on?
Yeah, I'd say this much: #ifdef INT64_IS_BUSTED #error "unsupported platform" #endif -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
