On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 10:47:33AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > As pointed out here > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2010-01/msg00145.php > the current zic code doesn't cope gracefully with lack of working > int64. Considering the trouble we've gone to throughout the rest of > the system to support such compilers, it's a bit annoying to have > this little detail break it. On the other hand, it's unclear that > anybody still cares. (Other than people running SCO Openserver, for > whom I have little sympathy anyway.) > > Thoughts?
There was a use case for supporting non-working int64, but reality has changed. > Is it worth expending any energy on? Not IMHO. Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
