Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: > > On m??n, 2010-01-04 at 13:07 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> Yea, I am not excited about having vacuumdb do only analyze, but it > >> seems the most minimal solution. I spelled it --only-analyze and just > >> posted the reason and patch. > > > I can't find the patch and the reason, but note that we already have > > other options like --data-only, --schema-only, --tuples-only. I > > personally don't like the spelling of --only-analyze. > > In particular note that pg_dump has options --schema and --schema-only, > and nobody has complained about that. I concur with Peter that this > spelling is gratuitously unlike everyplace else.
Oh, interesting about pg_dump. Let's just go with --analyze-only. --only-analyze is feeling odd to me too. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
