>> I'm torn between thinking it would be good to spell it that way and
>> thinking that we should have "serializable_isolation_implementation"
>> GUC (or something to that effect) which maps to an enumeration
>> containing "snapshot" and "ssi". Opinions welcome, since I've put
>> that GUC at the top of my implementation list. :-)
Hmm. Why would we use a GUC for this instead of an additional option
to BEGIN TRANSACTION?
I would think:
BEGIN TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL {READ COMMITTED | SNAPSHOT | SERIALIZABLE}
With our current levels being the first two of those.
Or is that a bad idea?
...Robert
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
