On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Joshua D. Drake <j...@commandprompt.com> wrote: > On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 16:33 +0000, Dave Page wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Joshua D. Drake <j...@commandprompt.com> >> wrote: >> > On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 15:12 +0000, Dave Page wrote: >> >> Hey Andrew >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> >> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > Windows came late to the buildfarm. According to the CVS log, the >> >> > buildfarm >> >> > client was first checked in in Sept 2004, got initial Mingw support in >> >> > Jan >> >> > 2005 and MSVC support in March 2007, when we finally got some of the >> >> > tools >> >> > sorted out. >> >> >> >> Right - but the buildfarm isn't a feature being offered to end users. >> >> >> > >> > Neither is this. These people are developers or DBAs after all. >> >> I know I'm a little slower than normal this week as I've had some sort >> of virus, but say what? I was kinda under the impression that >> developers/DBAs are end users of PostgreSQL. They make up a >> significant percentage of people that I know than install, configure >> and use it. > > My point is... if they are a developer or DBA, they aren't going to have > any trouble dealing with these issues.
What issues? Lack of support from PGAN, or having to download and install a complex build environment weighing in at over a gigabyte of downloads, just to install an add-on? -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
