On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 17:55, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Michael Meskes <mes...@postgresql.org> writes: >> On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 03:41:10PM +0100, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: >>> Hmm not sure I find that commit message really helpful - but is it >>> actually of any use to maintain a Changelog file specifically for >>> ECPG? > >> Makes it easier to see what's new in ecpg when doing a new >> release. But I guess we could get all this from the cvs log too. The >> file has been there for a long time. > > Well, I'm pretty sure that release notes are prepared off of the cvs log > entries. I've never looked at ecpg's Changelog when working on notes, > and I'd be prepared to bet that Bruce hasn't either. My advice is to > drop the Changelog file and be sure you describe changes appropriately > in the commit messages.
+1. Seems really weird (and unnecessary) to have a changelog for just one small "subsystem", when we don't have it for the others. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
