Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Meskes <mes...@postgresql.org> writes: > > On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 03:41:10PM +0100, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > >> Hmm not sure I find that commit message really helpful - but is it > >> actually of any use to maintain a Changelog file specifically for > >> ECPG? > > > Makes it easier to see what's new in ecpg when doing a new > > release. But I guess we could get all this from the cvs log too. The > > file has been there for a long time. > > Well, I'm pretty sure that release notes are prepared off of the cvs log > entries. I've never looked at ecpg's Changelog when working on notes, > and I'd be prepared to bet that Bruce hasn't either. My advice is to > drop the Changelog file and be sure you describe changes appropriately > in the commit messages.
Agreed. I was never aware of an ecpg changelog file. Let's remove it and Michael can make any clarifications to the major releases he wants. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
