On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > We could if we could all stop long enough to address them. I think > there is the feeling that a great idea will pop up eventually, and only > when we are looking at beta do we realize we are out of time, and the > hard, sometime distasteful/ugly, decisions have to be made.
I think there's definitely some truth to that. It's basically a project management issue: how do we make sure that decisions get made on a way forward in a timely fashion? Of course, you already know my opinion: the first thing we need is a good list of what the issues are. :-) >> > What amazes me is how many people who closely follow our development are >> > mystified by what we do during that pre-beta period. >> >> Hey, I'm still mystified. Maybe you and Tom could do twice-a-week >> status updates on what you're working on and anything you could use >> help with, or something. > > Yea, that would probably help. I know I am not very transparent in this > area. Just my opinion: I think it would be awesome. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
