Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
Jim Nasby wrote:
Why does warn; in plperl log as NOTICE in Postgres?
Where would you like the warning to go? This has been this way for
nearly 5 years, it's not new (and before that the warning didn't go
anywhere).
I think he's suggesting that it ought to translate as elog(WARNING)
not elog(NOTICE).
*shrug* I don't have a strong opinion about it, and it's pretty easy to
change, if there's a consensus we should. I have certainly found over
the years that perl warnings from some modules can be annoyingly
verbose, which is probably why the original patch didn't make them have
a higher level in Postgres. If this were a big issue we'd have surely
heard about it before now - there are plenty of plperl users out there.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
