On Jan 21, 2010, at 4:55 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > *shrug* I don't have a strong opinion about it, and it's pretty easy to > change, if there's a consensus we should. I have certainly found over the > years that perl warnings from some modules can be annoyingly verbose, which > is probably why the original patch didn't make them have a higher level in > Postgres. If this were a big issue we'd have surely heard about it before now > - there are plenty of plperl users out there.
Using elog(WARNING) certainly makes a lot more sense to me… David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
