On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > On tor, 2010-01-21 at 18:05 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> Well, we used to have the idea of a feature freeze ... is that going >> to apply at the end of the commitfest? > > Feature freeze was used to discourage the submission of very big patches > shortly before beta. The commit fest process has IMO alleviated this > concern. Beta is still the definite cutoff; and the closer we get to > beta, the smaller the acceptable changes become. I think that formula > basically applies throughout the entire cycle.
I'm not sure whether you're stating a position that's been agreed to by -core or some other group, or just expressing your own opinion, but I think feature freeze should be the beginning of the last CommitFest, not the end. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
