Robert Treat wrote:
I'm not saying there aren't
downsides, but having a name the community can unify on is a definite plus, and
imho that name has to be Postgres.
Translation: "we'll only be unified if everyone agrees with me."
Sorry, that is quite clearly not going to happen.
Can we please get on with actually making a better product? Raising this
issue again is simply an unnecessary distraction.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
